Oct 30, 2009

Suspected heroin just tobacco at Columbia Point Marina

A specially packaged bundle of suspected heroin found in a bathroom at Columbia Point Marina turned out to be a block of chewing tobacco.
The package was found Tuesday when a maintenance worker bumped into the ventilation screen inside the bathroom, Richland police Capt. Mike Cobb said.
Officers initially thought the package had six, 1-ounce bindles of heroin and speculated it was left there for someone on a state Department of Corrections work crew to pick up, he said. 
About 90 seconds after it was found, a van of inmates from Coyote Ridge Corrections Center pulled into the marina for a break, Cobb said. The inmates had been picking up litter along Highway 240.
Further testing showed the package contained a block of chewing tobacco that has the same consistency and appearance of black tar heroin, Cobb said.
Investigators still have no proof the package was left for a Coyote Ridge work crew inmate, but Cobb suspects it was.
"Who else would treat that as contraband other than someone in the penal system?" Cobb said. "It's the only reasonable explanation I can think of."

Oct 28, 2009

Tobacco seized at city ferry port

CUSTOMS officials are investigating an alleged attempt to smuggle around 400 kilos of tobacco into Plymouth.
A 46-year-old man and a 71-year-old woman, both from the Durham area, were arrested at Plymouth ferry port on Saturday.
They were subsequently interviewed by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) investigators.
UK Border Agency officers say they uncovered the haul in a people-carrier vehicle disembarking a ferry from Roscoff, France.
The tobacco was enough to make 800,000 cigarettes.Both people have been released on police bail until January 26, 2010.
The case is being handled by HMRC criminal investigators and inquiries are ongoing.The revenue allegedly evaded is estimated at around £46,000.

Oct 26, 2009

Off Beat: Clark College professor’s theory goes up in smoke

Clark College is justifiably proud of its pioneering status as a no-smoking campus.In 2005, Clark became the first public college in Washington to abolish the use of tobacco.
Clark was also a national leader as one of just 25 colleges in the country to become tobacco-free.
And, Clark was the second community college in the U.S. to take that step, according to Rebecca Wale, environmental health manager.
... Which must have been an interesting turn of events for some former Clark students. It wasn’t just that tobacco was tolerated at Clark for decades. In 1946, it became part of a classroom exercise.
Echoes of that era popped up in The Columbian’s archives in a story about Tony Bacon, longtime Vancouver newsman who died in September.
In the story, Bacon recalled enrolling in Clark College as a 16-year-old in 1946. It was just after World War II, and many of Bacon’s classmates were veterans who were going back to school on the G.I. Bill.
Homer Foster, who taught history and social sciences, liked to conduct experiments in class. His classes were filled with veterans, and half of them were smokers.
Foster had heard that smoking impaired reasoning abilities, Bacon related. Foster set about to test this point on the first day of the quarter. The professor divided his students into smokers and non-smokers, and handed out an exam.
When the results were in, the professor was amazed at the results: The smokers had way better grades than the non-smokers, Bacon said.
"Poor old Homer Foster decided then and there that he should become a smoker," Bacon told the writer.
"He wasn’t very adept at it, but he kept puffing away because of the results of this hysterical experiment."
Hatching a penguin
There’s another bit of irony in the no-smoking policy: Clark College might owe its "Penguin Nation" identity to something that has been banned from campus.
According to one story, the roots of the school’s mascot could be traced to a Clark College student who swiped a mechanical penguin from a promotional display at a local drug store.
As the story goes, the pilfered penguin advertised Kool cigarettes.

Oct 22, 2009

A call to arms for tobacco store owners

Let us consider the case of a cigar store owner. No food is served. No alcohol is available. The only products are cigars, tobacco products and accessories. Because no alcohol is served, it doesn't qualify for status as "Specialty Tobacco Bar."
Let us also assume that this establishment is owned by a retiree, the sole employee. He started this store because of his love of cigars. He has become something of an expert and customers often seek out his advice, much in the way a wine enthusiast may seek the opinion of a sommelier.
Under the expanded ban he will not be allowed to sample a new cigar in his own store in order to provide advice for his customers.
Who is being harmed and needs to be protected by the expanded ban? Does he not have the right to run his business to the best of his ability?
I would urge all tobacco store owners to call their City-County Council member and urge him or her to vote against Proposal 371.

Oct 19, 2009

Bill McKewin: The outrageous tax on tobacco

So there's a proposal in the Wisconsin State Senate to raise the liquor tax 50 cents per liter.
Wow! That's a drop in the shot glass compared to the tobacco tax that amounts to more than the product itself is worth. Of course, we're well aware of all the problems tobacco causes. Just ask the police, especially the overnight shift, how many tobacco related calls they answer and how many vehicle crashes were due to someone smoking too many cigarettes.
It's common knowledge, family violence and divorce are directly linked to tobacco misuse. There's no question, nursing homes are full of 80- and 90-year-old smokers collecting Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. Scientific evidence suggests that tobacco, not vehicle emissions and coal fired industrial plants, are causing severe environmental damage.
Destroyed friendships, impaired thinking, poor job performance and even termination - yup, not alcohol, that's all on tobacco. Vandalism, burglary, rape and murder, in many cases, could be prevented if people weren't messed up on tobacco. And how many tax dollars go to rehab centers treating tobacco addiction?
BUTT - Bureaucrats for Universal Tobacco Taxation - recommends taxing tobacco users to the point of cessation because they can no longer afford the product. That will cause the pool of tobacco users to shrink and, in turn, will cause a shortfall in tax revenue, which will have to be made up by increasing the tax on those remaining users.
Eventually, because of financial hardship, the pool of tobacco users will be reduced to a single smoker who will be responsible for all the revenue. Of course, with only one smoker left on earth, the egregious problems caused by tobacco will have been all but eliminated and the complaints will be a barely audible squawk in the night - ingenious!