State Must Renovate the Anti-Smoking Efforts

In the last few years, we have seen a downside to the good quality of life that makes the Volunteer State so attractive.

One aspect of that downside is the high rate of adult and childhood obesity, and the other is the paucity of funds allocated to restrict smoking. Efforts to reduce childhood obesity have shown some slight improvement, the (Nashville) Tennessean reported earlier this year, but the efforts to curb smoking appear headed in the wrong direction.

A new study by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and reported by the Tennessean this month ranks the state dead last among other states and the District of Columbia in funding anti-smoking programs. The report was tilted "Tobacco Control State Highlight 2010."

Other statistics in the report are equally sobering. Tennessee is 39th for low tobacco taxes, even though the Legislature raised the tax by 42 cents per pack of cigarettes - from 20 cents to 62 cents - three years ago. The tax remains below the national average of $1.34 per pack.

The state ranks 43rd for the likely chance that workers in Tennessee will be exposed to smoke in their jobs; 45th for the number of smokers who use the state quit-smoking help hot line; 46th for the high number of adult smokers and 47th for youth smokers, ages 12-17.

Elected officials can blame the poor funding of anti-smoking programs on the current state of the economy, but that argument goes only so far. Tennessee brings in about $400 million in tobacco taxes and payments from a settlement agreement involving dozens of states and tobacco companies.

Tennessee's share this year is about $145 million. And, while the bulk of the money arguably could go for health care costs, a portion of the money was promised for anti-smoking programs.

Tennessee's contribution to those programs this year was a paltry $200,000, creating an uphill struggle for state health officials. The spending was down from $10 million in 2007 and $5 million in 2008. The CDC says the state should be spending at least $7.1 million each year.

Tennessee made progress with the 2007 outlay, and the number of smokers dropped from 27 percent of the population to 23 percent in 2008. That clearly demonstrates the effectiveness of the wise use of the tobacco-settlement money.

However, other states made gains as well; some even used the tobacco-settlement funds as they promised and didn't allow progress to stop after one year.

As the CDC report noted, tobacco use is the single most preventable cause of death in the U.S. Moreover, diseases attributed to smoking result in $96 billion in health care costs annually.

The report challenged state officials to work creatively by using high-impact, cost effective measures to curb smoking, even in challenging economic times.

We urge those officials to keep up the fight. Tennessee's quality of life doesn't begin and end with the scenic mountains, hills and lakes. It also includes what we put in our mouths and breathe into our lungs.

Tobacco giant backs retail protest

A lobby group of small retailers protesting the Government's tobacco price hike is receiving public relations support from Imperial Tobacco, the tobacco giant told a select committee last week.

The Association of Community Retailers (ACR), set up late last month, had earlier rejected suggestions it was backed by tobacco cash and said it was entirely funded from its members.

The ACR shared a postal address with Omeka Public Relations, whose managing director, Glenn Inwood, also represented Imperial Tobacco and Japan's Institute of Cetacean Research through another PR company, blogger Keith Ng revealed.

Mr. Inwood said earlier this month the ACR received no funding from tobacco companies or himself but purely from members' subscriptions.

"It's running off the smell of an oily rag."

One of the ACR's coordinators, Denielle Boulieris, told another blogger, Rory McKinnon, earlier this month that the association does not have a relationship with tobacco companies.

But Imperial Tobacco's New Zealand sales and marketing director, Tony Meirs, last week told a Maori Affairs select committee the company was providing the ACR with public relations resources through Omeka Public Relations.

Mr. Meirs told the select committee the company wanted to support retailers in speaking out about regulations that would damage their business viability, according to a transcript provided to Mr. McKinnon.

"This is our way of helping those retailers protect their business against unnecessary regulations that will be ineffective. We're helping them to develop a voice," Mr. Meirs said.

He told the select committee he did not know the value of the public relations support Imperial Tobacco was providing, and was unable to say whether Imperial Tobacco would be better off if the ACR achieved its aims.

"I don't know, because whether Imperial Tobacco would be financially better off or not depends on how we compete in the marketplace, how we compete for adult smokers. So it's just, the two just aren't linked," he said.

"I support the position of those retailers wanting to develop a voice, wanting to put their argument forward to protect their businesses from unnecessary regulation."

ACR founding member Richard Green, who ran a tobacconist business in Palmerston North, told NZPA earlier this month the ACR grew out of the former Stay Displays coalition of retailers, a coalition that formed to fight a proposed ban on displaying tobacco products for sale.

ACR would speak for retailers on a wider range of subjects affecting retailers, such as security, sale of alcohol and confectionary, and was set up with the help of Mr. Inwood, who had also worked on the Stay Displays campaign.

Mr. Green said the sole funding for the ACR so far came from its members. It had employed two part time coordinators but it had yet to figure out how they would be funded, as it was still early days.